Search for: "POWELL v. STATE"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
The briefs filed in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
” Powell also pointed to two cases, Barr v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 10:01 am
This is the situation that occurred in the Second Department's decision in Novelty Crystal Corp. v PSA Institutional Partners, L.P., 2008 NY Slip Op 00242 decided on January 15th. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 1:54 pm
This suggests that, as a practical matter, Powell v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
In 2013, the Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
By denying a person participation in jury service on account of his race,” Powell explained “the State also unconstitutionally discriminates against the excluded juror. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 11:33 am
Supreme Court - United States - Government - Law - Judicial Branch [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 7:12 am
In NLRB v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 7:21 am
Title: Ryan v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:47 am
Smith and State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 5:16 am
Barber v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 5:16 am
Barber v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:19 pm
" "Not so here," Kozinski wrote in Doody v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:14 am
Statistics show the imposition of the death penalty has sharply declined in the Lone Star state over the past two decades. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:01 am
Kentucky, holding that Smith does not apply when “a defendant requests such an evaluation or presents psychiatric evidence”; and Powell v. [read post]
13 Oct 2018, 1:01 am
(Sherman, p. 79) The law was the most famous ban on miscegenation in the United States, and was overturned by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1967, in Loving v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 3:11 am
” Salmon Spawning & Recovery All. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:59 pm
” But as Ben Barros has shown, it was actually deliberately inserted in the Midkiff opinion (O’Connor refused to take it out even after Justice Lewis Powell warned her that it would license virtually unconstrained takings).That said, Stevens is wrong to suggest that the Court’s only options were either to overrule Midkiff and Berman v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am
The question in Hermès v. [read post]
