Search for: "PRICE v. CORPORATION COMMISSION"
Results 821 - 840
of 915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
He's a veteran of such battles as Hexion v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 11:30 pm
Peter Rehder v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 7:22 pm
In 1991, Caserta was barred by the Securities and Exchange Commission from "association with any broker, dealer, or investment advisor. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
Corporations found guilty of these two sections must pay a fine not exceeding $100,000,000. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:32 am
By Brian VillaIn Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 11:55 am
Commissioner Rosch v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:27 am
In Reading Int'l Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
In Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
It is not surprising that the industrial codes resulted in restricted output, higher prices, and reduced consumer purchasing power. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, the principal laws that protect investors and preserve business integrity are (i) the Securities Act of 1933, (ii) the Securities Act of 1934, (iii) the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, (iv) the Investment Company Act of 1940, (v) the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and (vi) the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Grubb v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
In December 2008, after the Securities and Exchange Commission (”SEC”) concurred in the exclusion of shareholder proposals seeking greater disclosure of risks related to mortgage investments at Washington Mutual, a coalition of over 60 investors called on then President-Elect Obama to limit the ability of companies to exclude shareholder proposals related to corporate risk evaluation.[10] The corporate governance challenges for the companies being… [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 9:22 am
Kaplan v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 9:59 pm
V. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law)… [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
(Ars Technica) RIAA – Shahanda Moursy sues RIAA for fraud, abuse and legal sham (TorrentFreak) Tenenbaum, Joel – Defence team’s unorthodox tactics in illegal file-swapping case incurs judge’s displeasure (Ars Technica) US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court New Hampshire: Domaining registrar defeats cybersquatting lawsuit: Philbrick v eNom, Inc (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (The Trademark Blog) District Court N D… [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP) Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP) Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark) Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46) Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 8:19 am
., v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:40 am
V. [read post]
