Search for: "Page v. United States et al" Results 821 - 840 of 942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
At every level of government in the United States (and often in other countries), there are laws that empower the public to file requests for public records. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:16 am by Don Cruse
Wednesday November 10, 2010 (sitting in Amarillo) Genesis Tax Loan Services Inc., et al. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
It has given us unprecedented access to public affairs information—local, state, national, and international. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
” The piece emphasises the need for an Anonymisation Unit and training. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 7:43 am
Christie et al., Employment Law in Canada (2nd ed. 1993) at p. 623]In saying that, Justice Iacobucci was quick to point out that:I note, however, that not all inducements carry equal weight when determining the appropriate period of notice. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 After losing before the New Jersey Supreme Court, Princeton appealed to the United States Supreme Court with an absurd argument that their institutional First Amendment rights were violated by requiring that it allow people like my client on campus. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
Consent to jurisdiction, which is a required element of a counter-notice under section 512(g)(3)(D), is a meaningful legal concession, and is particularly problematic for users who do not reside in the United States. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
Hogan Lovells’ Simon Nesbitt et al. commented on March 26, 2014 in Lexology: While certain countries have terminated individual BITs, termination of all BITs would be unprecedented. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:38 am by Lyle Denniston
  The three-judge panel was unanimous in Maqaleh, et al., v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am by Marty Lederman
In an article here back in July, I explained why Judge Cannon is wrong and why the Supreme Court was correct to hold in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am by Kelly
Fossil, Inc. et al (Docket Report) CAFC: Liability for offers to sell clarified: Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:30 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected each of these theories, and dismissed the plaintiff’s claims in their entirety as a matter of law this past week in Dimond, et al. v. [read post]