Search for: "People v Barrett"
Results 821 - 840
of 898
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2025, 1:43 pm
For example, during oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 8:39 am
Zelman v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
I admit that I'm no expert in the doctrine in this area, though I do watch it out of the corner of my eye, and I can't recall reading a more ridiculous standing decision in the last 10 years or so than the one the Court endorsed in the 303 Creative v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
., Frankfurter's opinions first in Gobitis and then his angry and anguished dissent in Barnette that helped to establish the split within liberalism between those who believed in "judicial restraint" and those who were beginning to rally around what came to be called "Footnote 4" liberalism instantiated in such decisions as Brown and then, perhaps most strikingly, Baker v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:33 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
" Pulliam v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
The current Supreme Court has at least three members who seem strongly influenced by originalist constitutional theory--Associate Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am
Regardless, plaintiffs argued that they were entitled to strict scrutiny because required “sexually explicit” labels on video games had been struck down by the Seventh Circuit, and Brown v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 6:55 am
“I don’t believe there were ever any career people fired at transition since the national security division was founded,” McCord said. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:16 am
’” In making that finding, Mehta had quoted the Supreme Court’s strict test for incitement in the landmark case of Brandenberg v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:52 am
Hsu, Tom Jackman, Devlin Barrett and Shayna Jacobs report for the Washington Post. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
As even Justice Barrett will tell you, if a party is not likely to win at the end of the day, there are very strong reasons to not grant any interim relief. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
Introduction: Margreth Barrett Devices: Sears/Compco/Bonito Boats/Traffix/Dastar: patent/copyright trump TM at least some of the time. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:00 am
The Bill enables people with terminal or life-shortening illnesses or progressive conditions which are terminal or life-shortening and who wish to end their own lives to obtain assistance in doing so. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
With apologies to Elizabeth Barrett Browning,[1] How may I appoint you; let me count the ways! [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
With apologies to Elizabeth Barrett Browning,[1] How may I appoint you; let me count the ways! [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Americans v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
See Dobbs v. [read post]
