Search for: "People v High" Results 821 - 840 of 15,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2008, 2:34 am
The Mills & Reeve team returned triumphant from the Court of Appeal recently after the Court held in favour of our client by upholding the High Court's decision in the case of (1) Laurence Wrenn (2) Integrated Multi-Media Solutions Ltd v Stephen Landamore [2007] EWHC 1833 (see IPKat's previous post on the High Court case). [read post]
Previous Indian case law In July 2018 India’s first ever SEP decision was issued by the High Court of Delhi in two joined (identical) disputes, Koninklijke Philips v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 6:44 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
North Carolina Supreme Court Finds a Batson Violation – For the First Time Since 1986 In a 4 to 3 ruling last week, the state high court in State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 2:39 pm by Howard Knopf
The deadline of January 18, 2010 for potential claimants in the Robertson v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
Discrimination The principle in Thlimennos v Greece requires unlike cases to be treated differently [40]. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:22 pm by Anna Gelpern
The English High Court just ruled in Assenagon Asset Management S.A. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:36 am by Eric Goldman
It cites statements from Senators that they expected SESTA would have a high scienter bar: Sen. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:21 am
Arbitration can be costly, drawn out, and even if the case is decided in a plaintiff's favor, isn't likely to result in compensation figures as high as what a jury might have awarded. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 1:47 am by war
One consequence of the High Court’s revolution in copyright law is that the privacy regime which prevents the use of the Integrated Public Number Database (and IPND Industry Code) to create reverse-number directories has been undermined. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 10:10 am by Stephen Bilkis
In discussing the Static 99, for example, and indicating that PH had scored a seven indicating that he was at high risk to commit a criminal sex offense, it was not clear to the court whether this meant that PH was at high risk to commit additional acts of exhibitionism or that PH was at a high risk to commit a sex offense as defined under article 10. [read post]