Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 821 - 840
of 52,272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2024, 4:22 pm
"Makes sense.But here's the thing that doesn't make sense: That we're having this whole fight over $440.California had to pay for (1) defendant's appointed appellate counsel (plus his counsel in the expungement proceeding), (2) the five lawyers on the caption in this case from the Attorney General's Office, and (3) the salaries of all the people in the Court of Appeal who worked on this matter. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm
On June 22, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in three cases addressing the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act: People v King, No. 142850, People v Kolanek, No. 142695, People v Kolanek, No. 142712. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm
Sometimes I talk about how a case doesn't seem all that different from other cases that do not result in the death penalty. [read post]
23 May 2019, 2:58 pm
It's a case from San Diego, and involves two boys -- nine-year old Jonathan, and his brother, thirteen-year old Charles -- who went out on a bike ride and never returned. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:23 am
For example, I'm not going to recite the facts that ultimately resulted in a case over which the California Supreme Court ultimately granted review. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
The California Attorney General confessed error, and the Court of Appeal reverses.Presumably making this guy (among others) incredibly happy:P.S. - The name of the defendant in this case is Sean Patrick M. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:43 am
Case Citation: Nelson v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 12:05 pm
You don't see many 82-page opinions by the California Court of Appeal in run-of-the-mill child molestation cases. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 8:25 am
The post Use of Summons v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 2:27 am
It then considered the case of Coleman v Attridge Law [2008] All ER (EC) 1105, which involved a claim that an individual had been treated less favourable than other employees because she was the primary carer of a disabled child. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
In Nevada v Hall, 440 U.S. 410 (1979), the U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 7:22 pm
" This is one of those cases. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:50 pm
Consequently, if King technically 'serves' the three distinct sentences imposed in this case, they would each mandate a separate sentencing enhancement in the event he is convicted of another felony in the future. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 10:33 am
Lochner v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:37 pm
There's not much of a constituency for the select group of people who kill someone and then burn down their house. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 11:12 am
But, just in case, let us make this perfectly clear. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
In Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:37 pm
Or, as in this case, for serving such people? [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:15 pm
The Court of Appeals reconsidered application of the exclusionary rule in People v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 1:05 pm
I agree with Justice Perren that the prosecutor's extended reference to 9/11 in this case was error, and also thought that Justice Perren (rightly) took the underlying issue seriously.That said, the opinion highlights the problem of prosecutorial misconduct and the wholesale inability -- or unwillingness -- of the judiciary to do much about it. [read post]