Search for: "People v. Givens"
Results 821 - 840
of 17,531
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2019, 12:33 am
Summary This case relates to a point of statutory construction in the Representation of the People Act 1983, s 90C(1)(a). [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:36 pm
On the consent of the People and pursuant to People v Dunaway, Mapp v Ohio and People v Huntley, a hearing was held in this matter on 19 October 2012. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 6:02 am
Garcia v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:42 am
Given the possibility of overlapping doctrines, do we even need the CFAA any more? [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:16 am
Commentary on the Ninth Circuit (Opinion in Robinson v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 9:19 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000 Read More [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:21 am
[first published at http://www.slaw.ca/2011/12/22/have-you-read-2011s-top-cases/ ] Subjective top ten lists are great for starting arguments given the improbability of any two people sharing precisely the same worldview. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 2:39 pm
The deadline of January 18, 2010 for potential claimants in the Robertson v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:28 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 2:54 am
In Kunitsyna v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
(People v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 6:43 am
Worcester v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 1:05 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 1:05 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 3:44 am
Judge Sean Cox’s decision in EEOC v. [read post]
Shoplifting Arrests in New York While Inside a Retail Store: A Review of the New York Legal Standard
17 Jul 2013, 12:15 pm
In finding that the complaint was facially sufficient at this stage in the process (remember, the standard is not "beyond a reasonable doubt" as it is at trial), the Appellate Court was clear in its analysis: "Given the number and nature of the items allegedly concealed by defendant, the store employee's sworn allegations were sufficient for pleading purposes to satisfy the asportation element of petit larceny and the intent elements of both theft-related offenses (see People… [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 10:42 pm
Is this the kind of "known or virtually certain" changes in expense that Hamilton v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:12 am
Ok, State v. [read post]
