Search for: "People v. Graves" Results 821 - 840 of 1,463
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2014, 1:08 am
Domestic rape cases in the late 18thand 19th centuries show that people did not even want to talk about rape in the context of the new prudery of the time. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The law is being used to strike back at those who use social media to abuse and humiliate people, argues Stacks Law Firm. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 8:41 am by Eric Goldman
Where, as here, a company’s public-facing statements are legitimately confusing, it is not the public’s fault for being confused. * Boston Globe: Boston Globe launches ‘Fresh Start’ initiative: People can apply to have past coverage about them reviewed * Owens v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:29 pm
“Nothing will happen to these people. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm by Fiona de Londras
The case of Z v United Kingdom (2001) 34 ECHR 97 illustrates this well. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
The LSC argued it was, citing R (Corner House Research) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2005] EWCA Civ 192 and, of course, Weaver v London Quadrant Housing Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 235 (our report here). [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 1:01 pm
.: Limited 1 March 2022 Original: English 22-02912 (E) Afghanistan, Albania, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Belgium, Belize, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Estonia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guyana,… [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 6:20 am by SHG
  Apparently, County of Riverside v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Wade and the purportedly democratic approach allowed by Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:18 pm by Josh Blackman
The state exempts people with medical objections, but not religious objections. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 8:03 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc., 540 F.3d 1242, 1249-50 (11th Cir. 2008), declined to sustain the Graves Amendment, 49 U.S.C. [read post]