Search for: "People v. Levy" Results 821 - 840 of 970
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2009, 11:38 am by James Hamilton
The legislation would require companies that sell products like mortgage-backed securities to keep some "skin in the game" by retaining at least five percent of the credit risk so that, if the investment doesn't pan out, the company that made, packaged and sold the investment would lose out right along with the people they sold it to. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 4:00 am
The original mission â€" to get more and more people talking about their end of life wishes â€" hasn’t changed. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 3:23 am
” The Supreme Court rebuffed one such effort in its 2005 Kelo v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 2:25 pm
As most people here probably know, the Court heard oral argument last September in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(This doesn't seem to go to sponsorship of communications v. sponsorship of products and services.) [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 4:29 am
(For a taste of the U.S. dispute, see Havana Club Holding, S.A. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 1:21 am
Levi BurnetKINGS COUNTYFamily LawMedical Degree Acquired During Marriage Ruled Marital Asset; Wife Entitled to SharePurygin v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 10:31 am
In its view no fee could be required, despite the affixing of the Grüne Punkt logo, where the customer had shown it had fulfilled its obligations under domestic law through some other exemption system or self-management solution.Grüne Punkt brought an action before the CFI to annul that decision, arguing that the decision was disproportionate in preventing it from levying a fee on each package bearing its logo. [read post]