Search for: "People v. Michaels" Results 821 - 840 of 4,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2020, 9:11 am by John Jascob
Sarbanes and Representative Michael Oxley (R-Ohio), who passed away in 2016, crafted the Act to reform the accounting profession in the wake of the Enron and WorldCom scandals. [read post]
29 May 2009, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Conference Board of Canada’s IPRs in the Digital Economy report accused of being deceptive, plagiarised and ignoring independent study commissioned for the report (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Jeremy de… [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As the Supreme Court explained in the 1852 case of Moore v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:57 am by Marissa Miller
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette’s Len Boselovic covers Sandifer v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:31 pm by Jon Sands
The factors to consider are set out in People v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Amy Howe
Michael Kirkland of UPI reports on the case of Nidal Hasan, who is acting as his own attorney in his trial for the murder of thirteen people (and the shootings of twenty-nine more) in Fort Hood, Texas. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 4:59 am by Amy Howe
There’s still more commentary on King v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:17 pm by Mark Walsh
Michael Dreeben of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office, who argued for the government in Trump v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
I am re-uploading the episode to fix some audio issues and also to add more context on areas that people had questions about. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm by NFS Esq.
O’Melveney & Myers, Paul Salvaty and Michael Reynolds for Association of Southern California Defense Counsel as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Real Party in Interest. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:20 am by Ilya Somin
As political philosopher Michael Huemer points out, the situation is little different from one where we forcibly prevent a starving man from buying food that he needs to survive. [read post]