Search for: "People v. Seals" Results 821 - 840 of 1,161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” To “defraud the United States” has a specific meaning under U.S. case law: According to Hammerschmidt v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:58 pm by Alex R. McQuade
Navy SEAL Charles Keating came as a surprise attack. [read post]
15 May 2020, 10:59 am by Patrick Kennelly
” While Tsipko’s reasoning is purely subjective, the Russian people’s response has been objectively hostile to Putin. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:57 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Our website njwillsprobatelaw.com provides information on traffic offenses we can be retained to represent people. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
” This chapter discusses the attacks on the rule of law by the President and some in his orbit, including: (i) the rule of law; (ii) criticisms of laws by the President; (iii) The Hatch Act; (iv) other examples of violations; (v) military law; and (vi) pardons. 12.2 Rule of Law The President of the United States takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 7:35 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 7:20 am
Box 716 Hudson, NH 03051 Phone: (603) 622-6904 Easter Seals Easter Seals New Hampshire 555 Auburn Street Manchester, NH 03l03 Phone: (603) 623-8863 (V/TTY); (800) 870-8728 (Toll Free) Fax: (603) 625-1148 Web: http://www.eastersealsnh.org Epilepsy Granite State Epilepsy Society P.O. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 7:16 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta Jurecic posted the recording of the Ninth Circuit oral argument from Washington v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 10:00 pm by Tristan R. Pettit, Esq.
§ 106.50(2r)(bm) entitled “Animals Assisting Persons with Disabilities" which was a very confusing provision and only focused on animals that assisted people with visual, hearing, or mobility impairments and only applied to animals that were specially trained.Replaces the above statutory section with two separate provisions, one addressing Animals That Do Work or Perform Tasks for Persons with Disabilities, and one for Emotional Support Animals. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 10:00 pm
§ 106.50(2r)(bm) entitled “Animals Assisting Persons with Disabilities" which was a very confusing provision and only focused on animals that assisted people with visual, hearing, or mobility impairments and only applied to animals that were specially trained.Replaces the above statutory section with two separate provisions, one addressing Animals That Do Work or Perform Tasks for Persons with Disabilities, and one for Emotional Support Animals. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 10:00 pm
§ 106.50(2r)(bm) entitled “Animals Assisting Persons with Disabilities" which was a very confusing provision and only focused on animals that assisted people with visual, hearing, or mobility impairments and only applied to animals that were specially trained.Replaces the above statutory section with two separate provisions, one addressing Animals That Do Work or Perform Tasks for Persons with Disabilities, and one for Emotional Support Animals. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:51 am by Jordan Brunner
Carrie Cordero outlined a few quick thoughts on making national security arguments in court based on Washington v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 5:20 pm
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]