Search for: "People v. Sullivan" Results 821 - 840 of 1,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2008, 3:00 pm
At page 51, Justice Scalia, writing for the court, cited a law review article entitled, “The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 9:59 am by jonathanturley
New York Democrats have passed a series of laws that led to catastrophic losses in federal court, including the recent major ruling in in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 3:46 am by INFORRM
In 2009 the National People’s Congress passed a Tort Law. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 9:17 am by David Oxenford
Under the NY Times v Sullivan Supreme Court precedent, the decision in defamation cases quite often depends on the determination of whether the person who was allegedly defamed is a public figure. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:16 pm by Sandy Levinson
” If one were writing a latter-day Gilbert and Sullivan ditty about "people who would not be missed," Norquist would surely be a strong candidate to head the list. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 12:19 pm
And now, this week's legal eagle finalist couples (six people, six Harvard degrees, zero ankle bracelets): 1. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
In that respect, Pennsylvania's law is influencing what Fox in New York is allowed to say to people all over the country (indeed, all over the world). [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 19 May 2017, in the case of Dreyer v O’Sullivan, a psychiatrist was been granted a without notice harassment injunction against an ex-patient who has been harassing him. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:24 am by Rishabh Bhandari, Jordan Brunner
In the Foreign Policy Essay, Jacob Stokes and Alexander Sullivan argued that China will not fix North Korea, offering four other areas of focus instead. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child announced the formation of recommendations for children’s online protections based on responses from more than 700 young people ages 9 to 22 from 27 countries. [read post]