Search for: "People v. Tooks"
Results 821 - 840
of 12,206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2011, 12:40 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 2:31 pm
On appeal, the defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is not enforceable because the Supreme Court provided virtually no explanation regarding the waiver and took no measures to ensure that he, a first felony offender with a history of mental illness, understood it and was validly waiving his right to appeal. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:35 pm
Riley v Murray, then, sits uncomfortably with the Court of Appeal’s decision in Miller v College of Policing [2021] EWCA Civ 1926, which was handed down on the same day. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 11:36 pm
Why do people embezzle? [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:37 am
And sure, we all took constitutional law in law school, and vaguely recall various things therefrom. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:50 pm
People v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 7:31 pm
The court admitted the testimony as a prompt outcry, inasmuch as "evidence that a victim of sexual assault promptly complained about the incident is admissible to corroborate the allegation that an assault took place" (People v McDaniel, 81 NY2d 10, 16). [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:55 pm
Kalven categorized NAACP v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(Harvard University Press, 2020), and Jesse Wegman, Let the People Pick the President: The Case for Abolishing the Electoral College (St. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
Ripping facts out of context, the court took an email exchange by Dr. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
People v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Belize Social Development Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:40 pm
Unconditional Love In its Nov. 3 decision, the 2nd Court took aim at the Texas Supreme Court's 1891 decision in Heiligmann v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
He ultimately took control of their online accounts, posted their photographs online, and contacted their friends and siblings. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 6:25 am
Last year, we took a look at the case of Helmsley-Spear, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:22 am
People v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:01 am
” Carnegie Mellon University v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 11:35 am
(For Exhibit A, see Burwell v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:57 am
bas Klubs v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:19 pm
Sterling access to the evidence which, when eventually obtained, helped prove his innocence.So it was kind of shocking to see that in People v Woodrich (4th dept 9/30/11) the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, cited its decision in Sterling as the authority for rejection another inmates' motion for DNA testing:County Court properly denied the motion “because defendant failed to establish that there was a reasonable probability that, had those items been tested… [read post]
