Search for: "Peoples v. Peoples"
Results 821 - 840
of 72,889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2012, 3:52 pm
As the Court of Appeal's opinion itself reflects, the garage (1) had rows of pews in it, (2) had a pulpit at the front, (3) contained a prominent tub in which total immersion baptisms were routinely performed, and (4) was the site of regular church services attended by numerous people (including the victim). [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:07 pm
All we want to let the jury know is that the defendant has previously been convicted and that our judgment is that people with those priors may tend to perjure themselves as well -- or that a jury could at least reasonably take that into account. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 8:26 am
In People v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
In short, people with low enough IQs cannot always validly consent to sex, but as much as possible should be done to find out if they are able to make the decision for themselves. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 12:21 pm
Richard Banks,Is Marriage for White People? [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:04 pm
Beijing Science & Technology University (1999) (re-issued as guiding case #38) and Yang Baoxi v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 3:35 am
Zuckerberg has described a metaverse where people can be fitted with full-body suits that let them feel even more sensations, which she said was troubling. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:10 am
Would your analysis be altered given the classic exposition of the Ex Post Facto Clause in Calder v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 7:30 am
Many people are familiar with Donahue v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
The Court's opinion in People ex rel. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:38 am
’s arsenal of legal weapons: designating the Russian-backed separatist forces, the Donetsk People’s Militia and the Luhansk People’s Militia (collectively known as the Donbas People’s Militia) and their leaders, as foreign terrorist organizations (FTO) under Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) as amended (codified at 8 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:53 pm
Now, all those 213 people don't have an election to run in, and their terms automatically expire. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:17 am
It's good for the people who were libeled. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:54 pm
Along with the ACLU, we challenged the law and won core protections for internet rights in a Supreme Court case, Reno v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:51 pm
And I have serious concerns that, at least in some cases (though by no means in most of them), that decision might even result in people innocent of an offense being convicted. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm
., if burning your own house gets you two years in prison but burning other people's houses only gets you one? [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:10 pm
"The point is this: Yes, it'd be remarkably random for Wear to interject in a text fight about flirting with people over Facebook that he intended to kill some random guy not involved at all in the whole Facebook dispute. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:06 pm
I've often heard people defending various K-12 speech restrictions by citing Morse v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 8:54 am
" The case is Arizona Broadcasters Association v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 1:37 pm
People v. [read post]
