Search for: "Peoples v. State"
Results 821 - 840
of 50,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2015, 12:08 pm
Here's a crime that doesn't fill up a plethora of pages in the California Appellate Reports: a state criminal prosecution of the owner of twelve Subway restaurants for underpaying state sales tax revenue.Notwithstanding the prosecution, white collar criminals everywhere should be happy at the underlying events. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:12 pm
Super 7 Media, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 12:04 pm
For lots of people. [read post]
19 May 2012, 1:36 pm
Burnip v. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 8:36 pm
People v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 10:59 am
In the last blog entry, the Fourth Amendment Right to Privacy implications of the United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:10 am
Would your analysis be altered given the classic exposition of the Ex Post Facto Clause in Calder v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
In People ex rel. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:00 pm
Just recently, in Riley v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 10:42 am
The way it looks right now, Ohio State will finish the regular season ranked Number 1 and there will be great dissension about the team that Ohio State should play. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In Rucho v. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 9:08 am
Wiggins, 279 P.3d 1 (Colo. 2012) (quoting C.R.C.P. 45 as permitting subpoenas to request ESI); People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:58 am
RianoWhat Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:25 am
State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:15 pm
New York Supreme Court Justice Thomas Marcelle ruled Monday in the case Cuomo v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 2:58 pm
Erskine will almost certainly not in fact be executed by the state. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome and/or consent to… [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:05 pm
Back in January, we warned about what happened today: the United States Supreme Court has okayed police pulling people over to search their vehicles based upon an anonymous tip in the case of Navarette v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 9:03 am
In Dr Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v. [read post]
