Search for: "Perez v. Doe "
Results 821 - 840
of 889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2021, 8:33 am
But while the school must therefore control virtual classrooms as it does physical ones, it does not follow that it may control online—or offline—speech outside the "school context," even when off-campus speech has effects on campus. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:10 pm
See Perez v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:21 am
Does the single standard duties test for each exemption category appropriately distinguish between exempt and nonexempt employees? [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Perez v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:40 am
Asked whether the Court was in some way signaling federal agencies that it will be taking a closer look at significant changes in long-established administrative policies, Employment Law Daily advisory board member Richard Gerakitis (Troutman Sanders LLP) responded, “Actually, I think that SCOTUS gave us this signal back in Perez v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
District http://t.co/pRretycdAF -> Antonick v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Even where a product’s risks were unavoidable, it required an independent balancing of risks and benefits – the kind of thing the FDA does – before the risks involved would be considered “apparently reasonable. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:52 pm
“But that word does no such thing,” the DC Circuit wrote. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 5:59 pm
“But that word does no such thing,” the D.C. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 4:49 am
What does catcalling have to do with anything? [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 5:19 am
” Accordingly, the appeals court vacated the district court’s decision (Perez v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 8:18 am
Perez is a long and complicated one. [read post]
6 May 2023, 5:01 am
In Bernstein v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:39 am
Chaker v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 4:30 am
And what does the learned intermediary doctrine have to say about that? [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 7:32 am
Perez, December 5, 2014, Greenberg, M.). [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Barber: The court overruled State v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:00 am
Canada US targets Canada over copyright in Special 301 Report (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) (Michael Geist) Federal Court awards $250,000 to Microsoft over sale of two computers with unauthorised copies of Microsoft software: Microsoft v PC Village et al (Excess Copyright) CIRA: Complaint dismissed, costs awarded against… [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:55 pm
The appeals court pointed out that the DOL’s case would depend on the information received from 150 other state employees who had consented to the disclosure of their identities, and that the state employer already had this information in its possession (Perez v United States District Court, Tacoma, April 18, 2014, Trott, S). [read post]
