Search for: "Perez v. State"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,489
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2014, 6:17 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:55 pm
The appeals court pointed out that the DOL’s case would depend on the information received from 150 other state employees who had consented to the disclosure of their identities, and that the state employer already had this information in its possession (Perez v United States District Court, Tacoma, April 18, 2014, Trott, S). [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 6:58 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 5:57 am
The employer was therefore entitled to attorneys’ fees under the EAJA (Gate Guard Services v Perez, April 7, 2014, Rainey, J). [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:29 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:29 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
PEREZ, AND REV. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 6:54 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:28 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:12 am
The employee’s derivative state-law claims failed as well (Troester v Starbucks Corp, March 7, 2014, Feess, G). [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 10:32 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
Court finds much to dislike about proposed class action wage settlement; denies preliminary approval
10 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 5:23 pm
Related Posts: Taxing Eggs: A Mini-Symposium Taxing Eggs: Introduction to Perez v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:23 pm
Obama, and Perez v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:17 am
Zelenak, for agreeing to join us in discussing Perez v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:35 am
I previously introduced Lisa Milot (Georgia) as one of our guest tax experts for today’s mini-symposium on Perez v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 6:24 am
A case kicking around back them was United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:11 am
As I mentioned in my first post, we’ll be joined by tax experts during this online symposium in order to discuss Perez v. [read post]
