Search for: "Petition of Smith" Results 821 - 840 of 3,020
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Supreme Court held that the federal government is not a “person” capable of petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to institute patent review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Smith; and (3) whether the Supreme Court should reaffirm Smith’s hybrid-rights doctrine, applying strict scrutiny to free exercise claims that implicate other fundamental rights, and resolve the circuit split over the doctrine’s precedential status. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm by Mark Walsh
Patent and Trademark Office under a 2011 federal statute, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:55 am by Steve Brachmann
United States Postal Service in which the 6-3 majority held that the U.S. government doesn’t qualify as a “person” for the purposes of petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to institute patent validity proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:55 am by Steve Brachmann
United States Postal Service in which the 6-3 majority held that the U.S. government doesn’t qualify as a “person” for the purposes of petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to institute patent validity proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am by John Elwood
And a thrice-relisted petition was granted and the judgment below vacated to consider the effect of intervening legislation. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:49 am by Ashley Deeks
Google worked with the Defense Department on the program, but in the summer of 2018, some 4,000 Google employees signed a petition objecting to the project. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am by John Elwood
That brings us to two related petitions: Comcast Corporation v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 5:55 am by Kathryn Moore
” The court then rejected Gupta’s argument that the agency’s longstanding interpretation of Section 405(g), before the government changed its position following Smith’s petition for certiorari, is entitled to deference. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:10 am by Edith Roberts
Oracle America Inc., a cert petition involving whether copyright protection extends to software interfaces, “the Supreme Court [would] have to look closely at exactly what an application program interface is. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Smith; and (3) whether the Supreme Court should reaffirm Smith’s hybrid-rights doctrine, applying strict scrutiny to free exercise claims that implicate other fundamental rights, and resolve the circuit split over the doctrine’s precedential status. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:54 pm by Law Offices of David P. Schwarz
   Nipsey Hussle’s sister Samantha Smith filed a petition for guardianship over Nipsey’s daughter, was assigned to a different judge for an initial hearing Friday afternoon. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Smith, a 1990 case holding that “[m]ere incidental burdens on one’s religious practice are inevitable and cannot be considered infringements on religious liberty” under the Constitution. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
When such affidavits do contain information on what the attorney claims to have done, and how many hours were expended on litigation tasks, it often shows how inflated the attested-to fee amounts are.Example of an egregious fee affidavit with Lodestar-type testimony: 3 hours to "draft" a standard collection case petition;20+ hours to obtain a default judgment. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
One of the most basic features of bankruptcy law is that the filing of a bankruptcy petition operates as an automatic stay of most actions against the debtor and against the property of the debtor’s estate. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:30 am by Scott Bomboy
Daugherty filed a habeas petition against his detention. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
Smith; and (3) whether the Supreme Court should reaffirm Smith’s hybrid-rights doctrine, applying strict scrutiny to free exercise claims that implicate other fundamental rights, and resolve the circuit split over the doctrine’s precedential status. [read post]