Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 821 - 840
of 55,682
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2022, 11:30 pm
In dealing specifically with the power of investment and the area of ethical investments, the court stated that the power of investment must be exercised to produce the best return for the beneficiaries and maximise financial return as a starting point. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am
The Supreme Court has decided exactly one case involving the privilege, and even that decision—in the Watergate tapes case, United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 5:31 am
Since Bhasin v Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71, courts have been applying the “organizing principle” of good faith in all contractual relationships thereby delinating its scope in different cirucmstances. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 11:52 am
I've been on the road this week, so I have just now had a chance to digest the transcript of the oral argument in American Electric Power v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:56 pm
While the government power granted to legislators is not the same as the power enabled by wealth, both are forms of power and not forms of speech.Second, Justice Scalia rejects the argument that even if voting is the exercise of power and therefore action rather than speech, it is symbolic action expressing a legislator’s view, much like flag burning is symbolic action expressing the anti-government view of the flag-burner. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
In Marbury v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 2:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 11:19 pm
In addition to their recent paper, Revesz and his co-authors have filed an amicus brief in support of EPA in West Virginia v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 5:00 pm
The case is Stewart v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:48 am
Permitting access may ultimately lead to regulatory liability, but denying access may give rise to additional liability.Read the decision at: Ontario (Environment and Climate Change) v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am
Background The appeal in R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal & Ors [2019] UKSC 22, concerned primarily the issue of whether the High Court has jurisdiction to judicially review decisions of the IPT, despite the apparent exclusion of such jurisdiction by way of section 67(8) of RIPA. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 12:05 am
Thomas School of Law (Minnesota) and University of California at Berkeley School of Law) have posted Executive Power v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 1:17 pm
Schwartz, discusses his new book, “The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 7:37 am
Holder, Bond v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 4:48 pm
Caneast Foods Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:38 am
Dana Raigrodski (University of Washington School of Law) has posted Property, Privacy and Power: Rethinking the Fourth Amendment in the Wake ofU.S. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
It has been criticised almost from birth:"We have found RIPA to be a particularly puzzling statute" (R v W, Court of Appeal, 2003)"longer and even more perplexing" than the "short but difficult" Interception of Communications Act 1985. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
It has been criticised almost from birth:"We have found RIPA to be a particularly puzzling statute" (R v W, Court of Appeal, 2003)"longer and even more perplexing" than the "short but difficult" Interception of Communications Act 1985. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
It has been criticised almost from birth:"We have found RIPA to be a particularly puzzling statute" (R v W, Court of Appeal, 2003)"longer and even more perplexing" than the "short but difficult" Interception of Communications Act 1985. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:19 am
Murphy further expanded the NJDOL’s stop-work powers in January 2020 when he signed a package of laws in response to recommendations by a Misclassification Task Force report released in July 2019. [read post]
