Search for: "Price v Price" Results 821 - 840 of 18,228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2010, 3:22 am by Harry Styron
Though the Court of Appeals doesn’t say so explicitly in the City of Sullivan v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 8:10 am by Daily Record Staff
Administrative Law — Public Service Commission — Price for electricity This case concerns a question regarding charges for electricity. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:01 pm
However, there was no indication of what that evidence was, or how it tied to the supplier’s actions.The August 4 decision in Dynegy Marketing and Trade v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 10:00 pm by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
The Federal Circuit denied the petitions for rehearing en banc filed in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 10:00 pm by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
The Federal Circuit denied the petitions for rehearing en banc filed in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:00 am
ABSTRACT: The Supreme Court's recent decision in Pacific Bell v. linkLine, rejecting antitrust liability for price squeezes by integrated dominant firms, is the... [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:25 am by Steve Clowney
Daniel Hertz summarizes some recent research (by property prof Vicki Been) on the Growth Machine v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 3:24 pm by Ann Lipton
Today, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its much-awaited decision in DFC Global Corp. v. [read post]
6 May 2007, 10:16 pm
According to the Madison County Record, attorney Stephen Tillery has teamed up with Judge Nicholas Byron in an attempt to revive the Price v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:00 am
ABSTRACT: The Supreme Court's recent decision in Pacific Bell v. linkLine, rejecting antitrust liability for price squeezes by integrated dominant firms, is the... [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 10:00 pm by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
District Court for the Northern District of California issued an order in Amgen, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 4:48 pm by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
On June 3, 2015, the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in Amgen v. [read post]