Search for: "Prince v State" Results 821 - 840 of 1,431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
The seven claimants bringing proceedings are: Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon OBE; Elizabeth Hurley; Sir Elton John CH CBE; David Furnish; Sir Simon Hughes; Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex; and Sadie Frost Law. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The Bladensburg Peace CrossThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that a cross-shaped monument may be preserved on public land because it does not violate the Constitution's Establishment Clause.Cultural property watchers may not have noticed the case of American Legion et al. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 9:26 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Court also heard the highly anticipated appeal of R (Evans) v Information Commissioner on 24 November regarding the challenge brought by a Guardian journalist to seek disclosure of written communications between the Prince of Wales and Parliament. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 6:09 am by Marc Mayerson
Regardless whether a particular jurisdiction is a "notice/prejudice" state, see Prince Georges Cty. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 6:09 am by Marc Mayerson
Regardless whether a particular jurisdiction is a "notice/prejudice" state, see Prince Georges Cty. v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
The letters show the Prince of Wales making direct policy demands to the then prime minister Tony Blair and several key figures in his Labour government. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 10:53 am by Vishnu Kannan
Circuit’s decision in Qassim v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
  At the hearing it was alleged that the Sun had received illegally obtained phone records of Prince Harry’s ex-girlfriend. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Zaccaro, Co., Inc. v DHA Capital, LLC, 157 AD3d 602, 602 [1st Dept 2018], lv denied 31 NY3d 907 [2018]; see also Jerome Prince, Richard on Evidence § 8-215 [Farrell 11th ed 1995]). [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Late last month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 5:44 am by Marci A. Hamilton
Massachusetts, which held that states have the power to make vaccination compulsory in the public interest and the 1944 decision in Prince v. [read post]