Search for: "R. R. D. v. Holder" Results 821 - 840 of 905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post from John Reed Stark, President, John Reed Stark Consulting LLC, and David R. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am by Paul Rosenzweig
 As the Court held in Fisher v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  TM holder free riding/trolling: pressure on mark exclusions/defenses. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am by RT
Heymann: This is tied to TM as source indicator v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
  Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Ellen Schrantz, Internet Ass’n: Robust success: the most fundamental point is that w/o that law there’d be no expeditious removal; you’d still have the task of removing content but you’d have to sue to get it down w/o 512. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:45 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Years later, John Adams wrote that this defense, in light of so much public scorn, was one of the finest things he’d ever done for his Country. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 8:35 pm by Josh Blackman
Here, I'd like to flag some changes made to the permitting process. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
[ii] Smart contracts have already been used in connection with real estate transactions,[iii] bank bonds,[iv] interbank transfers,[v] invoice financing,[vi] and homeowners, renters, pet, and flight-delay insurance. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am by Lisa Ouellette
(Related to literature on basing damages on R&D costs, which I review here.)Nicholson Price – The novelty requirement is not always aligned with social welfare, as illustrated by the biomedical field. [read post]