Search for: "Range v. Attorney General United States"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2023, 5:48 pm
The Attorney General of the United States serves the USSC in an “ex officio” capacity (he cannot vote). [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
Tough questions greeted counsel for both sides of this case—a seemingly mundane dispute about playgrounds and tire scraps that has potentially wide-ranging implications for the contours of religious liberty in the United States. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 7:10 am
Since 2003, a third of the net new jobs created in the United States were in Texas. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:55 am
Commenting on the same case, The TTABlog observes: “Applicant submitted substantial evidence regarding the strict regulations governing alcoholic beverages in the United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
United States, 524 U.S. 399 (1998). [read post]
15 May 2017, 4:47 pm
The Supreme Court has stated in Department of the Navy v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Attorney General Jeff Sessions and the Justice Department in their mission to apprehend and deport thousands of undocumented California residents. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Attorney General Jeff Sessions and the Justice Department in their mission to apprehend and deport thousands of undocumented California residents. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
The charges were announced today by Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
The charges were announced today by Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm
In addition to being strong and thoughtful statements of United States policy, these two speeches provide the framework within which my observations here can be better understood. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
" As the City noted in its brief, "[h]istorically black colleges do not discriminate, for instance, by establishing programs to 'disproportionately appeal to' black students, provided they are 'open to all on a race-neutral basis' (quoting United States v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 11:24 am
United States and Maxwell v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 11:43 am
This test was first articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Illinois v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Revd Paul Williamson in court again In July 1997, the Revd Paul Williamson was made the subject of a Civil Proceedings Order as a vexatious litigant pursuant to s.42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Restriction of vexatious legal proceedings), primarily as a result of a series of proceedings arising from his opposition to the ordination of women: see R v HM Attorney-General ex parte Reverend Paul Stewart Williamson [1997] EWHC Admin 691. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm
United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am
Noting CEQA’s general rule that the baseline must reflect physical conditions at the time environmental analysis begins (citing CEQA Guidelines, § 15125; Communities for a Better Environment v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Generally, a process server’s affidavit of service establishes a prime facie case as to the method of service and, therefore, gives rise to a presumption of proper serviceIn Matter of Reyes v Munoz, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 5226157 (Mem), 2021 N.Y. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 1:01 pm
The exclusion stems from an opinion by the state’s attorney general indicating that the state should carve out sectarian options to avoid violating the Constitution’s establishment clause, they observe. [read post]
