Search for: "Regents of the University of California"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,077
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2022, 10:41 am
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 404.) [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:47 pm
Regents of the University of California, the famous 1993 California Supreme Court ruling that a person has no property right in his excised spleen. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:50 am
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 8:30 am
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 8:51 am
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:16 am
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 8:30 am
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:23 am
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:41 am
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 8:01 am
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 9:29 am
Regents of The University of California (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 1043 is instructive. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:24 am
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:09 am
Regents of the University of California upheld a nationwide injunction blocking the Trump administration’s efforts to end DACA. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:40 am
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:56 am
BakkeIn Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm
The argument was in University of California Regents v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 6:38 pm
Regents of the University of California, which rejected the Trump administration’s efforts to terminate the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, an Obama-era policy that protected people who were brought as children to the U.S. without authorization. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 9:15 pm
Regents of the University of California, 383 P.2d 441 (Cal. 1963), which discerned in prior cases a "rough outline of that type of transaction in which exculpatory provisions will be held invalid": It concerns a business of a type generally thought suitable for public regulation. [read post]
5 Nov 2022, 1:59 pm
Powell Jr. wrote the plurality opinion in 1978’s Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:34 am
Regents, where the California Supreme Court held that mental health professionals had a duty to warn when they had an objective basis to believe that a patient intended to harm another person. [read post]
