Search for: "Rick Hills"
Results 821 - 840
of 896
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2008, 4:55 am
Here at Prawfsblawg.... [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 3:20 pm
Pam Karlan justifiably smacks down Rick Hills on his criticism of the lawyering in Riley.... [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 1:22 pm
My old undergraduate debate coach, Pam Karlan, has taken me to task on Balkinization for criticizing the plaintiffs' position in Riley v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 11:12 am
As my last entry in this series, I want to address the Hilary Putnam point Rick Hills has raised, and then, finally, I will move on to subjects that really matter, like Angelina Jolie's babies or the Red Wings' victory in the Stanley Cup Finals. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 7:39 am
Rick Hills:Being anti-intellectual is not the same as being anti-intellect. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:36 pm
I've always admired Rick Hills' facility with some rather dense intellectual material, so I hesitate to attack him for anti-intellectualism, even though he applies the label to himself. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:14 pm
In the course of explaining why he is an "anti-intellectual," Rick Hills invokes Martha Nussbaum, Immanuel Kant, Carl Schmitt, Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, Michel Foucault, George Orwell, Pierre Bourdieu, and Socratesâ€â [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Pam KarlanRick Hills's recent post over at Prawfsblawg on the Supreme Court's decision in Riley v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:25 am
I don't always agree with Rick Hills, but this time, he has it quite right: In my experience, intellectuals (as a class) are ideologically intolerant, easily offended by ordinary humor, and pretentious in their prejudices, which they disguise as universal truths. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 7:12 pm
But we're going to take a page from the Rick Hills playbook and confess that much of this is too "intellectual" for us (especially all the squabbling in the comments). [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 10:05 am
Several days ago, Rick Hills criticized legal scholars who use David Hume's famous "is-ought" quotation in the same way they might add a string cite for summary judgment standards in a brief. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 3:35 pm
Here's a guest post from Mike Pitts: In two posts over at Prawfsblawg, Rick Hills has taken the plaintiff's lawyers in Riley v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 7:56 am
Think about all the institutions we create in which reside remnants of tribal-like communities with tribal-like behavior (to Rick Hills' point, I won't say anything about Geertz and Balinese cock-fighting because I've never read it, but I will nominate it for the Hegel Award): law firms, corporate boards, faculties, Congress, the AALS. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 12:32 pm
And I'm equally pleased that Rick Hills will, effective immediately, be joining our crew on a long-term basis also. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 11:05 am
I thoroughly enjoyed the Rick Hills-Brian Leiter debate. [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:59 am
Rick Hills has this very interesting post on Riley v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 5:19 am
Rick Renzi (R-Ariz.). [read post]
26 May 2008, 11:30 pm
To get the full flavor of the importance of this decision, it is necessary to read all of the decisions in this litigation.Professor Rick Hills over at PrawfsBlawg predicts that the cert petition will be denied. [read post]
26 May 2008, 6:20 am
Posted by Jeff Lipshaw The recent debate between Brian Leiter and Rick Hills about the honorary degree granted to Phyllis Schlafly at Washington University raised some interesting issues about the relationship between truth and civility. [read post]
23 May 2008, 2:58 pm
" [Concurring Opinions] * Brian Leiter weighs in on Phyllis Schlafly -- and Rick Hills. [read post]
