Search for: "Robert S. Young " Results 821 - 840 of 4,756
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2020, 2:12 pm by Peter Margulies
As Chief Justice Roberts observed, Obama's Department of Homeland Security had found that DACA would allow the United States to benefit from "productive young people" who "know only this country as home. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm by Olivia Cross
  Justices Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined Gorsuch in the majority, while Justices Alito and Kavanaugh each wrote dissenting opinions. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 12:10 pm by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
For example, many people didn’t apply for DACA because they were too young, and it’s unknown whether they can apply now. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:39 am by Jacob Sapochnick
By a vote of 5-4, Supreme Court Justices Roberts, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Breyer rallied together in support of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, finding that the Trump administration’s 2017 efforts to dismantle the DACA program were improper. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:44 am by Amy Howe
Roberts then went on to the second step in the court’s inquiry. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 2:45 am by Pamela S. Karlan, Joseph Bankman
Were you surprised that Gorsuch and Roberts joined the more liberal justices or did you think—based on their overall philosophy and in particular on their reaction in oral argument—that you had them with you? [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 8:56 am by davidferriero
New works such as Martha Brockenbrough’s Alexander Hamilton, Revolutionary, Robert L. [read post]
The Court’s 6-3 ruling by a combination of its four liberal justices, as well as Justice Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts, has broad implications for employers across the country. [read post]
The Court’s 6-3 ruling by a combination of its four liberal justices, as well as Justice Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts, has broad implications for employers across the country. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
S. 542, a company was held to have violated Title VII by refusing to hire women with young children, despite the fact that the discrimination also depended on being a parent of young children and the fact that the company favored hiring women over men. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
S. 542, a company was held to have violated Title VII by refusing to hire women with young children, despite the fact that the discrimination also depended on being a parent of young children and the fact that the company favored hiring women over men. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 8:30 am by Gene Takagi
But if that’s the extent of our participation in the racial justice movement, it’s largely performative, and for some, may be more a public relations ploy than an affirmative act for justice. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 1:15 am by Ediberto Roman
Citing almost no law or other legal authority, Cotton filled a page with contempt for young Americans, and mightily tried to defend his panjandrum’s threat. [read post]