Search for: "Romans v. Romans"
Results 821 - 840
of 2,150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2014, 3:37 pm
In the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:56 am
Donovan v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:21 am
Second, members of Mutharika's party, the Democratic Progressive Party (remember that joke about the Holy Roman Empire not being Holy, nor Roman, etc.?) [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 6:01 am
The new Roberts Court would turn the tide on COVID-19 cases in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:40 am
Watson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 7:49 am
Williams v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:46 am
Advertisement And of course, as I have previously noted, there has been a transformation in the law on the religion clauses of the First Amendment, including a winning streak on religious liberty punctuated this term by the Court’s decisions regarding Covid restrictions in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 10:16 am
Malta-Roman v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 10:16 am
Malta-Roman v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 6:44 am
Supreme Court’s recent EEOC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Verret, Sunil Wahal, and Roman Weil.) [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
To the extent plaintiff's claim against PSC-CUNY arises from its appointment of plaintiff's allegedly negligent attorney and thus raises a distinct issue, his allegations constitute a claim that he was improperly represented by his union, which is untimely under CPLR 217(2)(a)'s four-month limitations period (see Roman v City Empls. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
To the extent plaintiff's claim against PSC-CUNY arises from its appointment of plaintiff's allegedly negligent attorney and thus raises a distinct issue, his allegations constitute a claim that he was improperly represented by his union, which is untimely under CPLR 217(2)(a)'s four-month limitations period (see Roman v City Empls. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 5:46 am
Science, but God v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
Yeah, I may prefer briefs that are double spaced and in Times New Roman font. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
This morning, in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:28 pm
J., concurring in denial of application for in-junctive relief) (slip op., at 2); see also Roman Catholic Dio-cese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 8:44 am
Roman Catholic Archbishop, 280 U.S. 1, 16 (1929). [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 7:46 pm
Here's what Nancy Pelosi said on Meet the Press yesterday: REP. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:48 pm
But the fact nonetheless is that the definition of "customer" which excludes feeder fund investors is not in the SIPA statute, but goes back, as near as I can tell, to the 2d Circuit court of appeals opinion in early 1976 in SIPC v. [read post]
