Search for: "Rosen v. Rosen"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2021, 12:45 pm
See Lexmark v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
” At Newsweek, Krista Gesaman has a preview of Snyder v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 6:42 am
Hatchet Job: Jeffrey Rosen's Utterly Bankrupt Analysis of Judge Sonia Sotomayor [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 5:36 pm
Van Upp v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 12:22 pm
Was cited in the following article: Colleen V. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
Evidence in the record—including plaintiff’s testimony, the firm’s filing of partnership tax returns and K-1s, and its representations to others—supports plaintiff’s claim that the firm was a partnership and that he was entitled to a percentage of the firm profits (see Rosen v Efros, 258 AD2d 333, 333 [1st Dept 1999]; see also 26 CFR 301.7701-2 [a]; Peterson v Neville, 58 AD3d 489, 489 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:31 am
Halper, Ellen V. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:20 am
It is incumbent upon the plaintiff to present expert testimony to support allegations of malpractice (see 530 E. 89 Corp. v Unger, 43 NY2d 776, 777; McDermott v Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hosp., 15 NY2d 20, 24), except where the alleged act of malpractice falls within the competence of a lay jury to evaluate (see 530 E. 89 Corp. v Unger, 43 NY2d at 777; Hammer v Rosen, 7 NY2d 376, 380). [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:33 am
The letter from Joel Rosen at CPR makes no reference to bringing the case in New York. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:26 am
Elsea v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 8:14 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 7:51 pm
Effectively the change moves closer to the Canadian position articulated by Sopinka J. in MacDonald Estate v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 12:57 pm
Rosen, Contextualizing Preemption, 102 Nw. [read post]
15 May 2014, 9:36 am
” Rosen v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:10 am
By Brad Rosen, J.D. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 5:00 am
By Brad Rosen, J.D. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 10:07 am
By Brad Rosen, J.D. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 4:05 am
P.A. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:35 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 5:44 pm
Neither is Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
