Search for: "Roy v. AT" Results 821 - 840 of 1,727
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am by INFORRM
  There is a discussion of their complaints on Roy Greenslade’s blog. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:46 am
Roy (rejecting religious objection to the government’s internal use of child’s Social Security number) and U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
  Roy Greenslade has an interesting commentary on the divisions in the coverage. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014)Venkatesh Nayak, Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative in New Delhi, has requested the circulation of the following essay, entitled "Promulgating Ordinances – Public Scrutiny and Judicial Review. [read post]
29 May 2014, 8:03 pm
Category: Claim Construction    By: Roy Rabindranath, Contributor TitleRealtime Data, LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:30 pm by Ronald M. Levin
The unconstitutionality of such a statute has been clear since Buckley v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 6:25 am
, ACA plan rate increases, Medicaid non-expansion and a few other interesting tidbits in this eclectic (and interesting) post.■ Health care guru Roy Poses is concerned about how much money is being thrown at the boob-tube over the past few years in attempts to influence the public's perception of ObamaCare. [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:30 pm by Stephen Wermiel
”  He then cited what he described as EPA’s similar position in a 2001 case, Whitman v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 11:38 am
Cette activité interprétative était ‘révélatrice’ d’un corpus de valeurs métaphysiques à laquelle seule la Scientia Juris des magistrats pouvait puiser. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm by INFORRM
This adjudication was also covered in the Press Gazette and also by Roy Greenslade. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Onyx Capital Advisors, LLC, Roy Dixon, Jr., and Michael A. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:23 am
From last month’s New Hampshire Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]