Search for: "S&C ELECTRIC COMPANY"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,124
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2011, 12:32 pm
Instead, Vernon is run for benefit of its laird, Mayor Leonis C. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Japan Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) – Operators of the Fukushima Daiichi plant. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:19 am
Authored By: Theodore C. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 4:00 pm
The OPA’s primary goal is to foster a global ecosystem that will help ensure the successful and broad adoption of 4G wireless. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Federal, state and local government bodies, non-profit organizations (e.g., those organizations described in Section 501(c) of the IRC and exempt from taxation under 501(a) of the IRC), qualified energy tax credit bond lenders, and cooperative electric companies are not eligible to receive this grant. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:39 am
Though Berkshire’s insurance businesses have, Buffett emphasizes, produced "an underwriting profit for eight consecutive years" and an underwriting gain of $17 billion during that period, underwriting profitability "is not an outcome to be expected of the P/C industry as a whole. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 12:27 pm
C. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:16 pm
§ 4332(C). [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:27 am
Yes, the electric company gets paid, but no, that's not direct financial benefit from the infringement. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
Look who's already attending (partial list): Joshua Zamir, Capstone EquitiesAdam Lichtenstein, Malkin PropertiesShawn Rosenthal, Ackman-ZiffAndrew Nimmer, The Carlyle GroupAlan P. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:48 am
The credit for residential energy property expenses can't exceed: (A) $50 for an advanced main circulating fan; (B) $150 for any qualified natural gas, propane, or hot water boiler; and (C) $300 for any item of energy efficient property (advanced types of energy saving equipment, such as electric heat pumps, meeting specific energy efficient standards). [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
This shaft, via a gearbox, powers a generator to convert the energy into electricity. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 11:48 am
Here is a compilation of the TTAB's precedential opinions/decisions for the calendar year 2010, categorized according to subject matter. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
(Patentology) (America-Israel Patent Law) US Patents 2010 sees record jump for patents issued in the USPTO (and IBM received almost 6,000 of them) (271 Patent Blog) Patent grants soar at the USPTO, while the allowance rate remains stable (IAM) Kappos on USPTO pendency reduction (Maier & Maier) False patent marking lawsuit update: A tale of successful defense strategy (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC deals with patent law malpractice: Warrior Sports v Dickinson Wright… [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 9:36 pm
See also, the interview of General Electric's Mike McIlwrath in July 2009 of Prof. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:08 am
In a number of cases contemporary with Chernow, respondents repeated the affix “www” within the second level domain, for example, , General Electric Company v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
(Patentology) WIPO issues PCT Notification No. 196 (IPKat) PCT Applications – Top national stage countries for 2010 (inovia) Licensee buys Licensor in advance of IPO: Smith Electric Vehicles UK and Smith Electric Vehicles US (IP finance) In defence of trolls (IP Factor) Global – Copyright ACTA the sequel: The Transpacific Partnership Agreement (Public Knowledge) Australia Warning labels threaten tobacco trade-marks – Or do they? [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
Because the jury's verdict on willfulness was not supported by substantial evidence, this court affirms the district court's grant of JMOL of no willfulness; the district court's alternative grant of a new trial for willfulness is thus rendered moot. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm
General Electric Company, et al. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 1:07 pm
Watanabe had claimed that, because it did not sell subject merchandise to the United States during the period of review (“POR”), it would not respond to Sections A, C and D of the questionnaire. [read post]
