Search for: "SHARP v. UNITED STATES" Results 821 - 840 of 1,471
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2014, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
Those presidents and their State Departments believe that they must do everything they can not to tip off those in the region that the United States government is now siding with Israel’s claim to sovereignty over Jerusalem, instead of remaining neutral. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
; * A clear vision of genuine use: Specsavers v Asda (again); * Chemists and mech/elecs unite! [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 30 October 2014, the Court of Appeal (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) handed down judgment in Reed Elsevier v Bewry. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:08 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  The problem is that Citizens United was a sharp and unjustified break with prior precedent. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:37 pm by Benjamin Bissell
Throughout the United States, the Ebola panic appears to be reaching a, pun intended, fever pitch. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:30 pm by Jane Bambauer
A more significant free speech victory for Big Pharma was delivered by the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:40 pm by Benjamin Bissell
” The report goes on to state that both the United States and Israel have been accused of sabotaging key aspects of the Iranian military in the past in the hopes of derailing Iran’s controversial nuclear program. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm by INFORRM
Reed Elsevier UK Limited (T/A Lexisnexis), heard 7 July 2014 (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 8 July 2014 (Sharp and Macur LJJ and Sir Timothy Lloyd). [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Terry Hart
This holding drew a sharp rebuke from the four Justices on the dissent, who said, “Fair use is intended to allow individuals engaged in productive uses to copy small portions of original works that will facilitate their own productive endeavors. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 5:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It thus became the third federal appeals court to reach that result; so far, no federal court at that level has upheld a ban in the wake of last year’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:40 pm by Amul Kalia and Vera Eidelman
PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) is the government-run online system used by lawyers, the press, and the public to access public federal court records in the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:40 am
After a jury convicted Christopher Castillo “of making a threat to injure or kill the President of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:55 am
“Businesses strive to operate more efficiently in a climate of sharp increases in operating expenses such as electricity and water. [read post]