Search for: "SMITH v. HEAD" Results 821 - 840 of 1,315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2018, 4:37 am by Christopher J. Walker
Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the Court in in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am by Melina Padron
The Head of Legal blog has helpfully provided a link to the EHRC’s submissions to the ECtHR, which encompass the Commission’s new line of argument. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary comes from Arthur Sapper at Ogletree Deakins, Coates Lear at The National Law Review, and Carlton Smith at Procedurally Taxing. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:06 am
- Inter-Continental Hotels Corporation, Six Continents Hotels, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
Evidently, the intellectual property bar cares a great deal about whether, under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, an inventor’s sale of an invention to a third party who is obligated to keep the invention confidential qualifies as prior art for purposes of determining the patentability of the invention. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:09 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Smith, a recent case, dealing with comments to a police department’s Facebook page, that discusses this issue.) [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 7:00 am by Staley Smith
” Ingrid Wuerth linked us to her new commentary on Zivotofsky v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am by John Elwood
Gividen for compiling the cases in this post, and the voices in my head for drafting it. ============================================================ New Relists Harris v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 60 (1st Cir. 2013) – all of which also travel under the heading, In re Neurontin Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian has a report on the evidence of Assistant Defence Minister Andrew Hastie at the defamation trial of Ben Roberts-Smith. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Smith, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 915, at pp. 937-38), or “a sufficient substitute basis for testing the evidence” (Khelawon, at para. 105). [read post]