Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF B. J. and J. J." Results 821 - 840 of 4,679
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2017, 6:47 am by Chris Castle
 The symposium’s formal title was “Authors, Attribution and Integrity” and was at the request of Representative John J. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Victor
Reuven S Avi-Yonah, Corporations, Society, and the State: A Defense of the Corporate Tax, 90 Va. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
There may be cases of that kind in which the interests of justice demand anonymity. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:29 am
  Conclusion of the court on expedition  Having refused a stay as sought by Sky, Arnold J accepted all reasons stated by Starbucks for ordering an expedited trial. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 10:24 am by FDABlog HPM
FDC Act §505(j)(5)(C)(ii)(I) states that: If an owner of the patent or the holder of the approved application under [FDC Act § 505(b)] for the drug that is claimed by the patent or a use of which is claimed by the patent brings a patent infringement action against the applicant, the applicant may assert a counterclaim seeking an order requiring the holder to correct or delete the patent information submitted by the holder under [FDC Act § 505(b)]… [read post]
13 May 2008, 7:00 am
The study was completed by Raegan J. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 8:16 am by Administrator
Johnson, 2021 ONSC 5136, Perell J. held that pursuant to section 5.(1)(a)(iv) and (b) of the Limitations Act, a limitation period commences at its earliest when the plaintiff discovers the underlying material facts or alternatively when the plaintiff ought to have discovered those facts by the exercise of reasonable diligence. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:38 am
  For this proposition, C&L cited one of our favorite cases:  United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:31 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Birch, Comparative Compensation for ExpropriationAlessandra Asteriti & Christian J. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:11 pm
The use of investor-state arbitration to protect investors’ interests vis-à-vis public interests has triggered considerable debate, especially concerningareas—such as public health and environmental protections—where the sovereign power to regulate clashes with the interest of investors.2An area of notable debate is the use of investor-state arbitration, particularly ICSID, by investors linked to the government of the… [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
The amended defence seeks to rely chiefly on the new public interest defence. [read post]