Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF H. W." Results 821 - 840 of 1,318
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
Moreover, there is no finding of bad faith in Maya – only a rather snide comment that “[h]ow Defendant . [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:33 am by Susan Hennessey
Ahmed Shuja Pasha called Pakistan’s long- standing partnership with the United States “stronger than ever,” explaining that both countries share an interest in rooting out al-Qaeda before its leaders have time to gather their secret cache of hidden weapons and move to a new location, possibly a tribal area in northwest Pakistan where Pasha said U.S. intelligence is limited in both its sophistication and reach. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
’s initials had been marked at the top right hand corner of the page, by Richard W., to indicate that Paul H. was the responsible partner. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 2:38 pm by LindaMBeale
  "[H]edge funds work with reinsurers to reduce tax liabilities for their wealthy clients. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 9:15 am by Florian Mueller
There's a lot more that could be discussed here about this very interesting and compelling opening brief. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
 We had a post on this interesting first instance decision about online forums on 18 April 2012. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:25 am by Ritika Singh
David McCormack at Daily Mail excerpts comments from Amazon.com customers unhappy with the U.S. targeted killing program: it’s today’s Moment of Zen (h/t Stephanie Dahle). [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:11 am by Patrick S. O'Donnell
Coady calls an “altruistic war”[or what Larry May terms a ‘humanitarian war’], in other words, humanitarian intervention comes close to being simply reduced to, or a euphemism for, a “just cause” rationale (sans any obvious State ‘aggression’ as understood in several articles of the UN Charter) for military intervention, that is, “military intervention in another state’s affairs in order to remove an awful government or to… [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am by Marty Lederman
  But in that case the Court stated that “[w]e attach some importance to the fact that appellees [individual members Congress there] have not been authorized to represent their respective Houses of Congress in this action” (emphasis added). [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:55 am by Barbara Bavis
For Those Interested in Privacy-Related Laws Matthew W. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 11:13 pm by Peter Tillers
Next Section Article Notes Declaration of Conflicting Interests The authors declared that they had no conflicts of interest with respect to their authorship or the publication of this article. [read post]