Search for: "STATE v. SULLIVAN"
Results 821 - 840
of 2,474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2020, 12:52 pm
Emmett Sullivan. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:24 am
%#@ Well, in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 2:40 pm
Sullivan and later cases. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 6:53 am
" The state regulations require that prison officials resolve the grievance appeal within 30 days. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The Town Attorney had concluded that Town Law §81 did not permit a referendum concerning term limits.Finding that there was no statutory basis for a public referendum on this particular issue, the Appellate Division ruled that Plaintiffs' petition failed to adequately allege a clear legal right to the relief Plaintiffs sought and sustained the Supreme Court's granting the Respondents' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' petition for failure to state a cause of actionThe… [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The Town Attorney had concluded that Town Law §81 did not permit a referendum concerning term limits.Finding that there was no statutory basis for a public referendum on this particular issue, the Appellate Division ruled that Plaintiffs' petition failed to adequately allege a clear legal right to the relief Plaintiffs sought and sustained the Supreme Court's granting the Respondents' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' petition for failure to state a cause of actionThe… [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 2:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:59 am
Sullivan. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 8:18 am
This week the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its opinion in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:12 am
Florida United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:15 pm
Sullivan. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 12:13 pm
But that record has evaporated thanks to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 10:49 pm
Sullivan at 50, 64 DePaul L. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:49 pm
Sullivan should not apply where speech concerns a private person. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:30 am
The Court of Appeal disagreed with Teare J’s finding that Mr Sullivan of BP should have given himself “legal” directions and that a decision based on the ordinary language of probability was appropriate. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
Kiobel v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:07 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 12:22 am
SULLIVAN, J.P., WILLIAMS, SWEENY, CATTERSON, MALONE, JJ. *1 (Cite ...
8.
The People of the State of New York, SCI / Respondent, v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 7:23 am
Patrick Guinane of the NWI Tmes reports today on yesterday's Supreme Court ruling in the case of State of Indiana v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. at 291 (quoting City of Chicago v. [read post]
