Search for: "STRANGE v. STATE"
Results 821 - 840
of 2,234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2009, 8:58 pm
However, there have been federal prosecutions of offenders who were not required to register in the state they were residing (U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:04 pm
A very similar case is pending before a three-judge-panel in Georgia – Georgia State Conf. of the NAACP v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:13 pm
Ceballos and Pickering v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 9:59 pm
For doing what you have a critical federal (as well as state) constitutional right to do? [read post]
16 May 2021, 7:06 pm
Types of enumer- ated adjustments include: (i) owner changes; (ii) differing site conditions; (iii) owner-caused delay; (iv) owner’s suspension of work; (v) force majeure; (vi) ad- verse weather; (vii) protester-caused delays; and (viii) effects of widespread dis- ease. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 8:51 am
The PACER records of USA v. [read post]
2 Sep 2006, 1:37 pm
IN RE Pratt, Pratt v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:51 pm
DOR, Appeal No. 2015AP2019, DWD v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
No surprise after United States v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:29 am
It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, in order to prevent our being swamped with incompetence. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:02 am
In Apache v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 10:24 am
First, in Cincinnati, in ACLU v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:41 pm
US v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 1:00 pm
Cal.) in Roe v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 1:27 pm
US v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 4:39 am
Below is an abstract of an article written for the ABA’s Tax Lawyer, titled The Amount of Trade that Makes a Trade or Business in Cameron v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 12:22 pm
It is one of the truly strange facts about the Supreme Court’s modern history of r [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:01 am
Similarly, in R.E. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 8:22 am
Rudovsky v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 1:06 pm
Mithun Mansinghani serves as solicitor general for the state of Oklahoma, which filed an amicus brief joined by 16 other states in support of the petitioners in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
