Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 821 - 840
of 19,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Supreme Court Oral Argument in OBB Personenverkehr v. Sachs, a Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Case
6 Oct 2015, 8:11 am
Saudi Arabia v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 8:06 am
(Supreme Court of the State of Delaware, May 2, 2019, Leaf Invenergy Company, v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:18 am
The Ninth Circuit's holding stated that the first sale doctrine would apply to foreign-made products if there was a sale in the United States authorized by the copyright owner because otherwise a foreign manufacturer would be afforded more protection from the U.S. copyright laws than a U.S. manufacturer. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:01 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court handed down a decision, , Tyler v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:11 am
In Accel Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 11:07 pm
Keith v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
District Court lowered the trust fund penalties assessed against a person in the United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:27 am
"Second, the Court adopted other states' formulation for deciding how sale-of-business covenants were to be analyzed. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 11:50 am
Our earlier posts cover both situations and today we’ve stumbled upon another example of the latter -- McCartney v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 4:34 am
State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:01 am
National Bellas Hess v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:59 am
BTD has noted the dissent of Justice Stevens in today's decision in McDonald v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 11:30 am
After the seller of a business sued the buyer to enforce a promissory note, signed as part of the sale, the buyer asserted a defense of fraudulent inducement in Bu v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:59 am
In John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:57 pm
Stockton Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 6:41 am
Epps v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 11:55 am
Vault Cargo Management, LLC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
Synergy Sport International, Ltd. v United States, 17 C.I.T. 18 (1993).Customs cites many difficulties with the application of the First Sale Rule as the reasons for the proposed change. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 7:55 pm
Synergy Sport International, Ltd. v United States, 17 C.I.T. 18 (1993). [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
After the Supreme Court reworked the on-sale bar test in Pfaff v. [read post]
