Search for: "Self v. Self" Results 821 - 840 of 21,807
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Property v. property: TM v. domain names; land v. chattels; IP v. consumer goods. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday in what is shaping up to be the biggest election case since its ruling nearly 25 years ago in Bush v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:30 am by Will Baude
Supreme Court's consideration of the issues presented in the Trump v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:50 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Ann Lipton – Business Law Prof Blog: “On Tuesday, Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery issued her long-awaited opinion in Tornetta v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Guest Author
”[6] In its 2018 final rule, the ATF interpreted “single function of the trigger” to mean “a single pull of the trigger”[7] and “automatically” to mean “as the result of a self-acting or self-regulating mechanism that allows the firing of multiple rounds through a single pull of the trigger,”[8] thereby including bump stocks in the definition of a machine gun. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
It would be utterly self-funded too with the price horn commands within the existing markets, with many many thousands of dollars changing hand within this vile trade. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Republican politicians have embraced immigration as a potent political issue. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:33 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
[I]magine a universe in which states, under the guise of “self-defense,” could decide to interfere with or otherwise impede federal trade rules or treaties, or other areas in which the federal government’s policy choices have foreign policy ramifications. [read post]