Search for: "Shorter v. State"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2024, 11:11 am
Campfield v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 2:13 pm
Procureur général du Québec (QCCA)(“CA decision”) and Hak v. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 11:13 am
On September 26, 2024, the First District Court of Appeal filed its published its opinion in Friends of the South Fork Gualala v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 12:02 am
In TYM v Ms. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:38 pm
The prospect of excessive surveillance through technology was recently front and center in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 1:20 pm
In today’s case (Kaur v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:46 am
Posted by Sherry Colb In my FindLaw column this week, I discuss the case of Graham v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 3:59 am
Norms within the framework of Savigny’s conflict laws referred exclusively to state law, assuming a state based on Western understanding. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:05 am
Additional Resources: Johnson v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:10 am
1 Dalzell v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 11:33 am
Moreover, in Lawrence v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 6:22 am
She talked about Housman v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:47 pm
In my view, a far better answer to the government’s argument is that the mandate isn’t “proper” even if it is “necessary” and that it runs afoul of the five part test recently outlined by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 3:36 pm
For instance, F.S. 768.28 requires any claims against the state, its agencies and subdivisions, you must put BOTH the state agency involved and the state’s Department of Financial Services on notice in writing (and sent on paper, not email, which will be deemed invalid). [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:13 pm
They found based on prior precedent cases such as Platsky v. [read post]
13 Mar 2025, 3:41 am
Unforeseeable business circumstances: Events like sudden market crashes or natural disasters may justify shorter notice. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 12:05 pm
The Oatmeal v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
The Eighth Circuit upheld this tactic in Rolwing v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
They’re also obviously at risk of simply describing, in a laudatory manner, characteristics of the goods or services in question.CJEU Cases C-398/08 P Audi AG v OHIM (VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK) and C-311/11 P Smart Technologies ULC v OHIM (WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH), already blogged by Jeremy hereand here, set out the position in Europe. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
For example, in Pacific Merchant Shipping Association v. [read post]
