Search for: "Slate v State"
Results 821 - 840
of 2,189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2017, 8:02 am
In Carpenter v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Brummel appealed and the mayor and the village cross-appealed.The Appellate Division ruled that Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the Blank Slate defendants and that branch of the motion of the Village defendants seeking to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Brummel appealed and the mayor and the village cross-appealed.The Appellate Division ruled that Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the Blank Slate defendants and that branch of the motion of the Village defendants seeking to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 1:10 pm
United States and Ortiz v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 5:34 am
Gore v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 6:14 am
We the People is a member of Slate’s Panoply network. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
” At Slate, David Gans explains why, although all eyes have been on Justice Anthony Kennedy as the potential swing vote in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 10:25 am
We the People is a member of Slate’s Panoply network. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 3:45 pm
Husted v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 2:20 pm
He filed an amicus brief in the CREW v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 4:42 am
Centre Lane Partners, LLC v Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher, & Flom LLP 2017 NY Slip Op 07221 Decided on October 17, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department illustrates two rules. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 4:31 am
We the People is a member of Slate’s Panoply network. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am
” At Slate, Daniel Horwitz weighs in on Janus v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 10:48 am
She was at her best in Gill v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 5:30 pm
Gill v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:00 pm
Here is a complete list of the cases slated for argument in the December sitting, along with brief summaries for the cases not already mentioned above: Monday, November 27 Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:01 am
” Additional commentary on Whitford comes from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am
Commentary on Jesner v. [read post]
