Search for: "Sparks v. State"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2011, 3:59 am
”But the Constitution includes the amendment process of Article V, which has already been used to alter the scheme by allowing an income tax and eliminating the power of state legislatures to select U.S. senators.Add to this, judicial construction of the Constitution vastly expanding federal power in just the past 60 years. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court stated in Schick v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:58 am
Unfiltered complaints v. investigated complaints: do client a big favor (and the AG too) by providing input early on. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The Judges’ Bill “decisively reoriented the institutional function of the Court toward the management of the law and its reception by the general legal public,” Post explains, and as jurisprudential ideas, controversial issues, and the Court’s membership evolved over the coming decades they sparked ever sharper divisions among the justices. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:28 am
The wisdom and efficacy of those measures is heavily debated, and they have sparked protests in a number of states. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:38 pm
That sparked a wave of "Impeach Earl Warren" billboards, especially in the South. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 9:02 pm
Bull, research director of the Administrative Conference of the United States; Colleen V. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:25 am
Sackett v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 11:48 am
As the Supreme Court stated in Virginia v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 2:48 am
Go back to this post from August about United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Smith, 375 N.C. 152, 2020-NCSC-45, ¶ 16; State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 8:39 am
Arkansas and Kitzmiller v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
In Ulane v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Sparks,[19] among other cases, the U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 4:52 am
Having a conversation about the state of feminism today should be a good thing, right? [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:27 pm
The ACLU is challenging Section 3 of the misleadingly named Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) on behalf of our client Edie Windsor in Windsor v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:53 am
They just shouldn't be allowed to get out early," said John Foreman V. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:23 am
Contrary to those accounts, Brown v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 11:58 am
Mary Ziegler (credit)Mary Ziegler, Florida State University College of Law, has posted three recent or forthcoming articles:No Such Thing as Race: Exploring the Past and Future of Affirmative Action after SchuetteOn the surface, Schuette v. [read post]
