Search for: "Spells v. State"
Results 821 - 840
of 2,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2012, 7:39 am
In State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing in McBurney v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
To state a claim under the California Voting Rights Act, you've got to establish "dilution" -- which in turn means that you've got to show that a particular district would be "majority-minority" (over 50%) to prevail. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 am
It’s the one that the modern test — first spelled out in detail by the Second Circuit in Arnstein v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 2:17 pm
OIP v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:30 pm
McGraw v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 8:06 am
” The manual cites a 1970 precedent, Perkins v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 8:31 pm
Visual Memory v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:35 am
In State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:49 am
Anyway, he offers the following: "Never put your faith in a spell checker; when you reed it back, it'll always let you down in the most embarrassing plaices" [The IPKat gave up using spell checkers when he started writing about trade marks, so many of which are classified as spelling errors]. [read post]
31 May 2021, 8:21 am
” Instead, it framed the issue as one of proximate cause, under the authority of Southern States Power Company v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 7:57 pm
Maryland Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:58 am
The relevant public by reference to which the absolute ground for refusal must be assessed is the average consumer in the Member State in which the place designated by a GI is situated. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
Merpel says, it's good to be able to spell 'Hoffman' with just one 'n' and not get that sinking feeling of having mis-spelled it ... [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:35 am
The Supreme Court ruled in 1965, in Griswold v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:27 am
The court dealt with this swiftly, stating that the component designs must be judged on their individual qualities, independently of the vehicle as a whole. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
F.S. 57.105 does state that: 1. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
Yesterday’s post discussing Arias v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:15 am
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977). [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 11:13 am
There's the first amendment case Texas v. [read post]
