Search for: "Starbucks"
Results 821 - 840
of 4,445
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2019, 5:16 am
"An elevator with Starbucks". [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 12:19 pm
Starbucks Corp., 2019 WL 1427435 (N.D. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm
UK SCt: Starbucks decision gives an embarrassing attempt to segregate markets internationally. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 10:46 am
However, a barista who accidentally poured hot water on a customer at the Starbucks counter is a good example of a case a finding of vicarious liability would likely be made. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 10:46 am
However, a barista who accidentally poured hot water on a customer at the Starbucks counter is a good example of a case a finding of vicarious liability would likely be made. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:21 pm
And like at Starbucks, the Wi-Fi is free. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:35 am
Those could have been Starbucks coins. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 7:58 am
Lawful Use: Precedential No. 39: TTAB Denies Concurrent Use Registrations For Wine Because Applicant Failed to Prove Prior Lawful Use in CommerceMark/Drawing Issues: TTAB Affirms Refusals of Color Pink for Tour Guide Services Due to Unacceptable Drawing and Lack of Acquired DistinctivenessTTAB Reverses Refusal to Register Starbucks' Green-Circle-on-White-Cup, but Green Circle Alone Lacks Acquired DistinctivenessNonuse/Specimen of Use/Failure to Function: TTAB Affirms Refusals… [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 6:55 am
Plastics News, “Sealed Air, Kuraray Join Forces for Plant-based Packaging” CNBC, “Starbucks Announces Trials for Recyclable and Compostable Cups” Baltimore Sun, “Maryland Senate Passes Renewable Energy Bill; House Outcome Uncertain” ScienceDaily, “First Evidence Bacterial-induced Apoptosis in Algae” Coatings World, “Clariant Launches First Bio-based Pigment Red 254” North Carolina Biotechnology Center, “bluebird bio… [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 6:10 am
Starbucks Corp., 679 F.3d 70, 79‐80 (2d Cir. 2012) (protection lost if outburst containing obscenities occurs in the presence of employer’s customers). [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 6:12 pm
Starbucks Corp., 2019 WL 699136 (E.D. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 9:55 am
Said Howard Schultz (the Starbucks founder who may run for President as an independent), which was quoted on "Face the Nation" this morning, in a question to John Hickenlooper, whose answer was so dispiriting that I turned off the TV in the middle. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 5:38 am
‘It is the woke idiots who think they are on some kind of crusade to change the world, when in fact all they are doing is patronising the fuck out of everyone around them and being generally unpleasant while sipping their oatmeal and cardamom chia smoothies and wanking on about how shit capitalism is from their MacBook Pros in Starbucks. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:47 am
For those judges and other millennial readers whose legal career began after the era of five dollar lattes at Starbucks, we explain our reference to the title of this superb post:Humphrey Bogart. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 9:52 pm
The internal memo, dated May of last year, states that Uber’s SIU team was comprised of 60 investigators with 15 leaders, many of whom were in their 20s and 30s, lacking any experience in crisis-related jobs, coming from previous employment backgrounds such as a Starbucks barista and a manager at Chipotle. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:00 am
In the wake of the #MeToo movement and Starbuck’s mandatory unconscious bias training day, organizations have become more and more concerned with and focused on offering more diverse and inclusive work places and inclusive work spaces. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:00 am
In the wake of the #MeToo movement and Starbuck’s mandatory unconscious bias training day, organizations have become more and more concerned with and focused on offering more diverse and inclusive work places and inclusive work spaces. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 1:54 pm
Starbucks. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 2:30 pm
Starbucks does not have a First Amendment right to discriminate against you because of your Christian beliefs. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 12:22 pm
In 2018, the California Supreme Court ruled that Starbucks and other companies must pay employees for tasks they perform after clocking out. [read post]
