Search for: "State of Minnesota v. District Court"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,678
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Clement argues that a recent ruling by the Supreme Court (Branch v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Clement argues that a recent ruling by the Supreme Court (Branch v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:49 am
Ziegler, 855 N.W.2d 551 (Minnesota Court of Appeals 2014). [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:33 am
Finally, the Supreme Court in Griggs v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:36 am
With its recent decision in Orca Communications Unlimited, LLC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 5:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
It also became clear during 2014 that — along with the reputational risks and operational integrity issues—cyber security also increasingly represents a potential liability exposure for corporate directors and officers, as highlighted by two sets of lawsuits filed this year First, as discussed here, in January 2014, shareholders filed two derivative lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota against… [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Mayo Holding Co., Minnesota District Judge David S. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 11:58 am
District Court for the Western District Of New York adopted Magistrate Judge McCarthy’s January 2, 2014 Report, Recommendation, And Order in EEOC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 10:24 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia recently held (pdf) that the U.S. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
And so on to February: In Utah, District Judge Dale Kimball blocked TV streaming company Aereo from operating in several Western U.S. states, at least until the U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 1:28 pm
District Court Judge Gary Feinerman (N.D. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
The subsequent class actions, on behalf of United States customers, were consolidated into the District of Minnesota. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:17 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:47 am
In a decision on remand from the Minnesota Supreme Court, the Minnesota Court of Appeals, held that the six year statute of limitations from Minn. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:28 am
District Court Judge in Minnesota. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 3:55 pm
In EEOC v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 7:54 am
Even if Nassar’s but-for causation standard were held inapplicable to the Minnesota Human Rights Act (the state high court has not yet spoken on this issue), the court explained, the employee’s evidence would not be sufficient to survive summary judgment. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:17 am
Still, a Fourth Circuit appellate panel (later reversed on procedural grounds) disagreed with those district court decisions, reasoning that the display of a Confederate flag off the job would indeed be “political” enough to be covered by the statute. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:56 am
Marlon Quan, Acorn Capital Group, LLC and Stewardship Investment Advisors, LLCCase number: 11-cv-00723 (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota)Case filed: March 24, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: September 22, 2014 11/26/2014 02/24/2015 [read post]
