Search for: "State of New York et al" Results 821 - 840 of 2,998
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2021, 8:19 am by Kevin Kaufman
The federal government repealed the tax in 1965 and New York (both state and city) effectively repealed theirs in 1981. [read post]
14 May 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Thus, a removal application that does not include the specific notice required by 8 NYCRR 277.1 (b) is fatally defective and must be denied (Application of Johnson, et al., 56 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,055; Appeal of White and Carmand, 56 id., Decision No. 16,994; Appeal of Kelly, 45 id. [read post]
14 May 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Thus, a removal application that does not include the specific notice required by 8 NYCRR 277.1 (b) is fatally defective and must be denied (Application of Johnson, et al., 56 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,055; Appeal of White and Carmand, 56 id., Decision No. 16,994; Appeal of Kelly, 45 id. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 10:48 pm by Bruce Clark
Some cases also related to travel to Italy.Severi et al., 2015[21]; EFSA 2014[22]; Chiapponi et al., 2014[23]; Rizzo et al., 2013[24]; Guzman-Herrador et al., 2014[25]; Fitzgerald et al., 2014[26]2013165Pomegranate arils (frozen)Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, WisconsinTurkeyUnknownCollier et al., 2014[27];… [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
Salazar, No. 08-1097ADEASee issue description at Public CitizenSCOTUS docket hereLewis, et al. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 5:03 am by Adriana S. Kosovych
A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et… [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 10:02 am by Anthony B. Cavender
A case in point is the recently decided case of State of New York, et al., v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 8:17 am by Steven Cohen
Lek Securities Corporation et al – United States District Court – April 8th, 2019) involves securities. [read post]