Search for: "State v Blake"
Results 821 - 840
of 995
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2007, 1:43 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000), and Blakely v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:47 am
Box 4210 Helena, MT 59604 Phone: (406) 444-7781; (800) 332-2272 (Toll Free) Fax: (406) 444-7781 Web: http://www.dphhs.state.mt.us/sltc AARP Montana 30 West 14th Street, Suite 301 Helena, MT 59601 Phone: (406) 441-2277 Fax: (406) 441-2230 E-mail: mtaarp@aarp.org Web: http://www.aarp.orgstates/mt ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Rocky Mountain Disability and Business Technical Assistance Center 3630 Sinton Road, Suite 103 Colorado Springs, CO 80907 Phone: (719) 444-0268… [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 3:00 pm
State (Judge Najam writing) and Sanders v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:10 am
The Oregon Federal Public Defender has this report, Developments in Federal Search and Seizure Law, and much more at their web site (including an Oct 2007 Blakely/Apprendi and State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 8:41 pm
There is an ironic symmetry to United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
Phone: (404) 881-0292 Fax: (404) 881-6997 E-mail: gaaarp@aarp.org Web: http://www.aarp.orgga ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Southeast Disability and Business Technical Assistance Center Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access Georgia Tech, 490 10th Street Atlanta, GA 30318 Phone: (404) 385-0636; (800) 949-4232 (V/TTY/Toll Free) E-mail: sedbtac@catea.org Web: http://www.sedbtac.org Georgia ADA Exchange 4164 Admiral Drive Chamblee, GA 30341… [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 6:24 pm
As noted in this prior post, a Sixth Circuit panel earlier this month indicated that all three members would "strongly recommend" en banc review of the "important question" of "whether the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement violates United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 7:28 am
" This ruling came in State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Banegas CA2/2 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 7:56 am
COLORADO STATE RESOURCES AGING Colorado Association of Homes and Services for the Aging 1888 Sherman Street, Suite 610 Denver, CO 80203-1160 Phone: (303) 837-8834 Fax: (303) 837-8836 Aging and Adult Services Department of Social Services 110 16th Street, Suite 200 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: (303) 620-4147; (800) 544-9181 (Toll Free) AARP Colorado State Office 1301 Pennsylvania Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: (303) 830-2277 Fax: (303) 764-5999 E-mail: coaarp@aarp.org Web:… [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 2:09 pm
Supreme Court's retroactivity analysis as stated in Teague v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:10 am
., et al & United States of America v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:40 am
As noted in this prior post, a Sixth Circuit panel earlier this month indicated that all three members would strongly recommend" en banc review of the "important question" of "whether the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement violates United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 5:05 am
These recent rulings came in State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:39 am
Read the Comments too.Excerpt from the blog post:"Providing a great reminder that there are still many unsettled Blakely issues, the Oregon Supreme Court today in State v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 4:59 am
New Jersey (2000) and Blakely v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 10:30 am
Providing a great reminder that there are still many unsettled Blakely issues, the Oregon Supreme Court today in State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 5:18 am
Network Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
An intriguing little opinion today from the Sixth Circuit in US v. [read post]
