Search for: "State v. Bailey"
Results 821 - 840
of 925
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2008, 11:24 am
Bailey v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 1:53 pm
This is a reminder that while Baze v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:33 am
Bailey, 103 Misc. 366, 171 N.Y.S. 394 (N.Y.Sup.Apr1918). [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 2:42 am
Regina (Kelly) v Secretary of State for Justice; Regina (Bailey) v Same; Regina (Gibson) v Governor of Wymott Prison Court of Appeal “In the criminal sentencing context, the court could read words into a statutory instrument to correct a drafting omission. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:13 pm
If Westlaw is to be believed, Ed’s first argument was in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:44 am
R (Kelly) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Bailey) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Gibson) v Governor of Wymott Prison [2008] EWCA Civ 177; [2008] WLR (D) 84 “Long-term prisoners who had been convicted of offences committed after 29 September 1998 and before 4 April 2005, and who after 4 April 2005 had been released on licence, recalled and then re-released having served three-quarters of their sentences, remained subject to… [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
" State of Indiana v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:57 am
For publication opinions today (3): In Noah Bailey v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:30 pm
Rodriguez Was Remanded Back to State Court, West Virginia University v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:04 am
Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Circus! [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 10:44 am
" Stephanie Bailey v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 7:34 am
Indiana State Univ. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 3:33 pm
International, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 6:28 am
Bailey, 221 Ga. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 6:11 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 10:35 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Felipe Romero v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 5:22 am
York v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
§ 1983, and for malicious prosecution, defamation, and tortious interference with a prospective contract, pursuant to Ohio state law. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 5:25 am
In Bailey v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Bailey, No. 06-5576 Defendant's conviction and sentence for drug- and firearm-related offenses are affirmed over claims that: 1) a prior Kentucky state court conviction for second-degree escape did not qualify for a career offender enhancement; 2) there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions; and 3) the district court erred in enhancing his Guidelines offense level after finding that he had perjured himself at trial. [read post]
