Search for: "State v. Beers" Results 821 - 840 of 1,282
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2019, 2:29 pm by Mark Walsh
The chief justice says that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Conference Board of Canada’s IPRs in the Digital Economy report accused of being deceptive, plagiarised and ignoring independent study commissioned for the report (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Jeremy de Beer) EWHC decides in favour of… [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM stated that the various… [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:00 am
Reed complained that the State had withheld exculpatory evidence regarding DNA testing of some beer cans found near Stites' body. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
§ 57-5-301(e)(1) (2002) (making it illegal for minors to possess beer ‘for any purpose’). [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:45 am by Jessica Kroeze
The following evidence inter alia was cited in opposition proceedings:D1: WO 02/15713D2: EP 0949329D3: DE 10163964D6: WO 02/051873D9: WO 95/21240D10: WO 97/29179D15: WO 96/22366D17: WO 00/70064D18: Kunze, "Technology Brewing and Malting", VLB Berlin, 1996, p. 83-87.The following evidence was filed with the appellant's statement setting out the grounds of appeal:D19: Excerpt from Südzucker Handbuch, "Erfrischungsgetränke", 2000D20: Leitsatz für… [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
(IPKat)   United States US General Third IP cross-retaliation strike against USA at WTO (Excess Copyright) World Economic Forum survey: US 18th in global IP protection (Intellectual Property Watch) Funds for US State Department global IP enforcement training (Intellectual Property Watch) Changes in USPTO senior management (Patent Docs)   US Patents PatentFreedom to offer subscription-based reexam service to attack NPE patents (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]