Search for: "State v. Borough"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 1:01 pm
This was an appeal by way of case stated. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 1:00 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 4:23 am
On Wednesday 9th March judgment will be handed down in Croydon London Borough Council v Kalonga, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 77. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 1:00 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 8:19 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 14/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard… [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:16 am
On Wednesday 23rd February, judgment will be handed down in Craig (AP) v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another, on appeal from [2020] HCJAC 22. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
London Borough of Southwark & Anor v Transport for London, heard 24-25 Oct 2018. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 2:34 pm
Borough of New Hope (3d Cir. 1984))). [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:52 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 07/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard… [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:27 am
In other words, the question was whether the judgment of Gage LJ in Tetteh v Kingston Upon Thames Royal London Borough Council [2004] EWCA Civ 1775 survived Hotak; ie that it remained correct in asserting that a review decision had to be read as a whole and that there was no reason for the reviewer to go further than stating the test and the overall finding. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm
Davies v Bridgend County Borough Council (2023) EWCA Civ 80 – the Court of Appeal on residual diminution in value/blight in nuisance cases (here Japanese knotweed) – it is not ‘pure economic loss, and is recoverable in damages. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm
Borough of Pine Hill, 189 N.J. 497, 520 (2007) (quoting State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:36 pm
London Borough of Harrow. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 12:25 pm
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, the federal appeals court with jurisdiction over Massachusetts, pretty clearly state in Glik v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:26 am
Borough of Ambler, 37 A.3d 27 (Pa. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm
Mr Francis was a tenant of the London Borough of Southwark. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm
Mr Francis was a tenant of the London Borough of Southwark. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 3:20 pm
As Borough President of Staten Island I want to inform you that this message conveys an atmosphere of intolerance which is not welcome in our Borough. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:31 pm
KQED, Inc., 438 U.S. 1, 11 (1978) (stating that “[t]here is an undoubted right to gather news ‘from any source by means within the law’” (quoting Branzburg v. [read post]
