Search for: "State v. Brady" Results 821 - 840 of 1,538
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by Austin Williams
  Upon agreement by all parties, Judge Nelson ordered Brady v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 36297 (D HI, March 31, 2011), an Hawaii federal district court rejected a Muslim inmate's claim that he was denied a diet consistent with his religious belief and was denied access to religious items.In Brady v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 9:00 am by Nathaniel Grow
Boies, of course, previously represented the NFL owners in the Brady v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
United States (1997), in which the Supreme Court held that the federal government could not require state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers as part of the implementation of a federal law (the Brady gun control law). [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am by Maureen Johnston
United States, or (b) “preventing further [government] disclosure,” United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 9:56 am by Kali Borkoski
The Court held that the substantial Brady claims in the case require a reversal of the petitioner’s conviction. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
Cecilia Bruni and Brady Plastaras preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  A notice of Molly Brady's  Brandeis Chair lecture at HLS, much of which she devoted to the legal history of single-family dwellings in the United States (Harvard Law Today).The University of Helsinki Faculty of Law "invites applications for a fixed term employment as a doctoral researcher or a postdoctoral researcher" with the project Comparing Early Modern Colonial Laws, led by Academy Professor Heikki Pihlajamäki. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:16 am
 It should be recalled that the US, despite being a party to both WIPO Internet Treaties, does not expressly recognise a making available right or a right of communication to the public, as instead the EU and its Member States do. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:01 am by Gritsforbreakfast
IANAL, but my personal view was that SB 187 did not provide enough discretion on sentencing to comply with the Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]